July 16

lessons on eugenics, part 2 (kill your children [so we don’t have to])

in 1974, the eugenicist Henry Kissinger (National Security Advisor at the time) published National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200). this study was adopted as official U.S. policy in 1975. as the title implies, the report discusses the need for population control in developing countries. the main form of “population control” endorsed is, of course, abortion.

Kissinger supported an interesting method of encouraging countries to engage in abortion, as seen in part 2 of the study:

Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relationships, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.

in case you missed it, let me spell that out for you: we should give preferential treatment with regards to food and aid to countries which are committed to using abortion as a method of population control. but, we should be sneaky about it!

it is important to note that the US refuses to rescind this policy, even after being called upon to do so ever since the report was made public in the early 90s. if something seems familiar about this, it’s probably because one of Obama’s first moves in office was to reinforce this policy of providing aid to abortion-happy African countries.

and if you still think this is all in the past, I refer you to a chilling statement made by our current National Security Advisor, James Jones to the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations): “As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger”.

hopefully this also gives some insight into why violent wars are perpetuated by the US. they are not meant to be won, only sustained, for the optimal amount of death and financial gain.

July 14

lessons on eugenics, part 1 (don’t drink the water)

a study was done 3 years ago stating that 1/3 of male fish in English rivers are turning female due to estrogen-heavy chemicals in the water (similar to drugs given to transgender men). there was concern that it could “even be affecting the fertility of men” who drink any water from these sources. “British men’s sperm counts dropped by almost a third between 1989 and 2002”, the article states, leaving little doubt as to the correlation.

flash forward to today, where “concerns about the “carbon footprint” of filtering machines means that the poisons will remain in the vast majority of the British water supply.” so the decision has been made, folks. the AlGoreWarming hoax is the cited reason for letting the peoples’ water supply remain poisoned, and the people go along with it because we have to save the polar bears’ icecaps from melting in the summer (the fact that they re-freeze in the winter is irrelevant and has nothing to do with reality). Gordon Brown’s “green adviser” surely likes that reproduction will be hindered, since he wants a 50% population decrease.

at least this is only happening to the Brits, oy? not so fast. Obama’s “science czar” would not only be okay with it, he advocated water sterilization as well as other eugenics methods such as compulsory abortions, forced sterilization, and implanted birth control, in his 1977 book Ecoscience. you see, some of the world’s “top minds” think the world is overpopulated, and (at least) 90% of humans need to die. of course, they are not included in the doomed percentage, because they are enlightened and have to carry out the plan.

do you think we all need to be sterilized? do you think we all need to be poisoned? do you think we all need to die? I should hope not. but one of our President’s top advisors certainly does. does that scare you?

conspiracy? if that’s still what you’re thinking by this point in my post, open your eyes.